|
|
Post by PonyMama on Aug 21, 2007 17:16:17 GMT -5
I was wondering if anyone else here was dealing with hourly 5 minute ticks (not only at the 12:00 and 00:00 Ticks), the constant timing out. The instant -5 minute post times and everything else that goes along with lag?
Because it is driving me batty.
|
|
|
|
Post by PandaLover on Aug 21, 2007 17:20:10 GMT -5
Yes, unfortunetly. I'm starting to wonder if it's just a computer or an Internet connection thing, because it seems that most people have normal ticks. However, mine won't bring up the actual pages for four-six minutes, almost every time. I'm not really sure what's going on, but I'm nearly possitive that's not supposed to happen....
|
|
|
|
Post by PonyMama on Aug 21, 2007 17:21:10 GMT -5
Yeah my pages which used to load within seconds are taking upward of 2 minutes to load. Which is driving me mad.
|
|
|
|
Post by PandaLover on Aug 21, 2007 17:23:27 GMT -5
*nods* Mine never took about two seconds; at least on on PI did they. They usually take around 10-20 seconds each, but in some cases I'm sitting here in the Valley for a good 1-2 minutes, waiting for the page to load. I swear, at this point it has nothing to do with the Internet. Though it was this way about six months ago, as well. At least with the ticks.  |
|
|
|
Post by PonyMama on Aug 21, 2007 17:30:52 GMT -5
It is only PI for me. I can still load a page at lightning speed everywhere else I go. But on PI it is running like snails.
|
|
|
|
Post by PandaLover on Aug 21, 2007 17:33:11 GMT -5
Too true. I think it might be because, even though they switched survers, they still have a fairly small surver, and it's not able to hold so many people switching the pages all the time. Though I guess that if we want to know for sure we'd have to PM Xarq.  |
|
|
|
Post by Farnley Kombu on Aug 21, 2007 17:37:05 GMT -5
I'm about to kill the server. The quickest tick I've had this week was five minutes.
|
|
|
|
Post by PonyMama on Aug 21, 2007 17:39:08 GMT -5
Yeah that is about average. Although I had one tick last well over 15 minutes adn that was not suppose to be a long one.
|
|
|
|
Post by Farnley Kombu on Aug 21, 2007 17:44:28 GMT -5
It's hard to believe that the server was just updated.
Yes, once I got a 12 minute tick when it wasn't 12:00:00 or 0:00:00
|
|
|
|
Post by Linaeve on Aug 21, 2007 19:44:17 GMT -5
So much lag T.T It just took me three minutes to refresh a page. Not cool man.
|
|
|
|
Post by nightfeathers on Aug 21, 2007 20:23:48 GMT -5
I am too. Its a major pain. -.-
|
|
|
|
Post by ryuukokoro on Aug 22, 2007 8:43:14 GMT -5
Yes I find lately I usually get about a 5-7 min. tick, which seems to be shorter if I keep refreshing (instead of letting it refresh itself when it thinks the tick should be over)
|
|
|
|
Post by Farnley Kombu on Aug 22, 2007 11:01:31 GMT -5
Yet another five minute tick for 17:00 -angry sigh-
|
|
|
|
Post by PonyMama on Aug 22, 2007 11:05:00 GMT -5
I have decided that from now on at the ticks I will refresh to show the pagefor the tick then come over here and not look back for a few good minutes, whenever possible. I bounce back and forth as it is (Must love tabs)
|
|
|
|
Post by PandaLover on Aug 22, 2007 11:09:21 GMT -5
Yeah, I do the same thing, PM. Thank goodness for window tabs. <3
|
|
Status: Coooosplayyysss. Vair busy kthxbai.
